Why Democracy is Bad for the Philippines

Anyone who views all of human history will see that democracy is a recent and tiny political phenomenon originating from the American and French Revolutions.

Western democracy originally came from the Greeks. It quickly showed its inehrent problems and died after Greece was conquered by the undemocratic Macedonians. Even the Roman Republic was not really democratic – it was divided into patricians (Elites) and plebians (Commoners). However, the ideas of Greek Democracy were preserved by the Romans until it was unearthed by the European Enlightenment.

There were other democratic societies in Asia and tribal regions . But unlike the Greeks or Romans, Asians thought it wise not to preserve democracy because of the weakness and instability that it creates.

• Greece was quickly overrun by the Persians who did not have democracy.
• The Roman Republic was a bit democratic but was defeated by the Roman Empire.
• China, after being unified by the Chin emperor, never became democratic. Instead, it had undemocratic Confucianism which helped it be a strong empire for thousands of years.

Prior to the Spanish, the Philippines was known as Maharlika which was a confederation of states that were vassals of or connected to Manila. Because of geography, the country never had a single ruler and so there was never a single identity nor unified set of laws. Filipinos still see themselves belonging to tribes like Tagalogs, Bisaya, Kapampangan, Moro, etc.

Maharlika was Already Democratic

Because of its topography*, democracy is already the natural state of Maharlika.

*Superphysics Note: This is explained by Social Topographic Behavior

As an archipelago, it is similar to the Greek islands with many Greek tribes such as the Spartans, Athenians, Helotes, and the Thebans.

• Manila could be compared to Athens as the commercial and political center
• The Tausug or the Ifugaos could be compared to the warlike, but principled Spartans

Like Greece, Maharlika was united by confederation in order to protect the freedom of each tribe. This natural sense of freedom in Maharlika carried over to the Philippines as the rebellions against Spain, the US, and Japan.

This inclination towards democracy does not need to be promoted or encouraged, otherwise, it would lead to a double democracy or pure democracy which is synoymous to mob rule and arbitrariness.

Instead of promoting democracy, Maharlikan leaders promoted a sense of community known as bayanihan. This is similar to the Inca idea of “ayni”. This promoted the common interest, as opposed to self-interest*.

*We can think of the common interest as the conscience of society which prevents it from hurting itself

Unfortunately, the country was colonized by America in 1902 which imposed democratic ideas based on self-interest. And so, the American colonization caused the Philippines to have a double democracy.

Spanish Philippines did not have such a democracy because the Church stifled liberalism and free speech which were made subordinate to the Roman Catholic. Proof is the execution of Gomburza and the arrest of Jose Rizal for their protest against Spain.

Unfortunately, democracy correlates with corruption. This was recently seen in the collapse of the ‘democratic’ Afghan government which was free to run away from the Taliban and give up their country, taking their money with them. This is because democratic leaders are elected for their popularity instead of their morals.

Democratic elections and politics then becomes a business, with its profits and losses, to be later recouped from corruption revenues.

It is no wonder that the First President of the Republic, Manuel Roxas, was corrupt. He and his party only saw their own vested interest instead of the larger common interest. Many Filipinos blame Marcos for instituting corruption when they fail to see that corruption was a natural consequence of the double democracy from America.

Corruption is also present in Africa and Latin American countries where moral systems have been neglected.

Maharlika avoided such corruption by having a semi-democracy bound by morals. In fact, one of the meanings of Maharlika is nobleness, gallantry, and respectfulness (maginoo). This is an improvement of the savagery of island people, just as the Greek gentlness that led to the Athenian democracy was an improvement over the barbarous Helotes, Persians, and Carthaginans.